| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - The Appeals Court vacated the ERP saying that it is contrary to the plain language of section 111(a)(4) of the Act.The Appeals Court further explained that it vacated the ERP because it violated section 111(a)(4) in two respects: First, Congress???s use of the word 'any' in defining a 'modification' means that all types of 'physical changes' are covered.
|
