| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - The Respondent argued that according to the data provided by the Appellant with its SGA, the accuracy of measurement was a variable factor as conceded on page 5 of the SGA and that determining the parameters placed an undue burden on the skilled person.VI. In its rejoinder dated 29 September 2007, Respondent II (O-02) also raised objections of lack of clarity and of extension beyond the content of
|
