| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - However, the blatant misread of the Plasticon statement regarding payroll by Pro Plas is a divisive and IMO devious spin on the rightful need for the Pro Mold facility to pay it is own payroll in this Ch 11.IMO these $7500 payments to Plasicon are for payroll, have nothing to do with anything other than payroll, and to imply otherwise requires the implier to prove the DIP monthly report (#158) inco
|
