| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - In such a case, the objection of lack of inventive step is not a fresh ground for opposition and can consequently be examined in the appeal proceedings without the agreement of the patentee.This applies mutatis mutandis to the present case, since the fact that in case T 131/01 (loc. cit.) the prior art was a document, whilst in the present case the prior art is a prior use, cannot give rise to a
|
