| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - By saying that determinism cannot be true because ??? the way he defines determinism ??? it would be impossible to determine everything, Glesier attacks his redefinition of determinism as if it is the same thing as the determinism that Sam Harris and others??? position of ???there is no free will??? rests on. (That is, there is a preceding event or condition that determines our choice of action ou
|
