| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - In Crawford v. State, 112 Ala. 1, 21 So. 214 (1895) (quoted in Cox v. State, 373 So.2d 342, 345 (Ala.Cr.App.1979)), the Supreme Court held: ???It is not every hypothesis of innocence, reasonable or unreasonable, possible or imaginary, the evidence must exclude, but only such hypotheses as are reasonable, springing from a consideration and comparison of the entire evidence.??? Id., 112 Ala. at 26,
|
