| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - Mr. Gilliland appealed.Affirming the trial court's judgment, the Supreme Court concluded that the jury's rejection of Mr. Gilliland's race and sex discrimination claims - and the fact that his jury instruction on constructive discharge made no mention of any category protected by the human rights act or other public policy - was fatal to his appeal.For additional background on the case, see Kriste
|
