| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - The evidence could also plausibly be interpreted either as a ???refer[ence] to industrywide acceptance of the competitive reality that back solicitation was an abuse of the interlining relation??? or as ???mean[ing] there were discrete, bilateral understandings between each defendant on one hand, and its interlining company on the other??? (rather than a horizontal agreement amongst the defendants
|
