| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - The court further found that Defendant was a sex offender within the meaning of SORNA, that he must register, and that ???[t]he act of registering is a collateral consequence of defendant's original plea.??? Defendant appeals.{11} On appeal, Defendant contends in his brief in chief that (1) subjecting him to registration as a sex offender under SORNA violates the Ex Post Facto Clause of the New Me
|
