| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - 5.9 The Complainant contended that the Respondent lacked the right to use the Complainant's SOUR PATCH mark as part of the domain name in dispute since <sourpatch.org> suggested that the Complainant was or may be authorizing or sponsoring a website associated with that domain name or that the domain name is a means of contacting the Complainant and relied on: Motorola, Inc. v. NewGate Internet, In
|
