| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - The court stated: Looked at on a favorable view to the plaintiff, the jury could choose to disbelieve Marsha Foreman???s [sic] testimony that she was unaware of plaintiff???s involvement in the beard case, and that she, not Martin, made the termination decision or influenced it in a retaliatory way and the jury could find there was a causal connection between the protected activity and the adverse
|
