| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - The Court has, moreover, often stated that the Convention is a living instrument, to be interpreted in the light of present-day conditions (see, among other authorities, Tyrer v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 25 April 1978, Series A no. 26, pp. 15-16, ???? 31; Loizidou v. Turkey (preliminary objections), judgment of 23 March 1995, Series A no. 310, p. 26, ???? 71; and Mazurek v. France, no. 3440
|
