| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - Claims 7 to 11 of auxiliary requests 2b for the Contracting States ES and GR were identical to the same claims of auxiliary request 2b for all designated Contracting States except ES and GR.XVII. Appellant I (patentee) requested that its appeal be declared admissible, that the decision under appeal be set aside and the patent be maintained on the basis of (i) claims 1 to 14 of the main request, or
|
