| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - Sandra argues that ???[j]udicial deference to Mass.R.Crim.P. 44(c)[, 378 Mass. 920 (1979),] in the circumstances of this case required allowance of the motion for recusal.??? Rule 44(c) states: ???The contempt charges shall be heard by a judge other than the trial judge whenever the nature of the alleged contemptuous conduct is such as is likely to affect the trial judge???s impartiality.???
|
